In general, most people consider themselves at least somewhat environmentally conscious. Most will tell you that they often recycle; but not always. They remember their reusable bags when going to the grocery store, maybe 50-60% of the time. And of course, they may feel guilty about long showers, but they take them anyway. Any of these sound familiar?
Well, one of the first things that needs to be clarified is that, knowing what’s good for the environment and actually doing it consistently are two completely different things. Fortunately, after years of repetitive environmental campaigns that relied on guilt and moral obligation, something interesting has been observed: game designers seem to understand human motivation better than most sustainability activists ever did!
Why Guilt and Fear Don’t Work (While Games Do)
Let’s just be honest about our nature as humans, we are terrible at responding to distant, abstract threats, and climate change is the ultimate threat of this type. Its consequences are indefinite, delayed, and most importantly, they are very hard to connect to personal everyday actions. As human psychology proves, our brains simply aren’t built to feel urgency about something that is happening gradually over decades and will mostly affect people we’ll never meet. That is an uncomfortable truth we have to understand and accept, if we want to effectively deal with issues of global scale.
And this is why decades of well-intentioned awareness campaigns have produced widespread knowledge about environmental problems, yet very little behavioral change; not to mention consistent actions. Knowing is way different than doing.
Games, on the other hand, leap over this obstacle entirely by offering something that modern brains crave: immediate feedback as impact proof, systematic visible progress, and the satisfaction of achieving big or small goals. When the Changers app (https://changers.com/) awards carbon credits for cycling to work, for example, the brain considers it a small win in the present moment, or when a streak counter in JouleBug (https://joulebug.com/) shows 30 consecutive days of eco-friendly challenges completed, there’s strong unwillingness to break that streak.
In reality, this isn’t something new. This psychological behavior is the exact same mechanism that makes people check their phones a hundred times a day, or keeps players grinding for hours in video games. The only question now is whether this powerful motivational mechanism can be used to our advantage towards something genuinely beneficial or not.
The Four Hooks That Make Eco-Habits Stick
Behavioral scientist Nir Eyal presents a model for how a product can create habits, and it applies unexpectedly well onto environmental gamification. This model’s cycle is: Trigger, Action, Variable Reward, Investment (Eyal, 2014 https://www.nirandfar.com/hooked/).
Let’s analyze the example of Forest (https://www.forestapp.cc/), an app which helps people stay focused while growing virtual trees (donating to real tree-planting), to see how this works in practice:
- The first hook is the Trigger. This could be the regular notifications that remind the user to start a focus session, or an image of a tree’s current state that lacks attention.
- The next hook is the Action. This is where the player interacts with the app by setting a timer and putting down the phone.
- The Variable Reward hook could be interpreted through not knowing exactly what kind of tree will grow or what bonus might appear.
- Lastly comes Investment. The more trees that grow in your virtual forest, the more invested in the system you become and, of course, the more it would hurt to abandon your forest and commitment.
The environmental apps that achieve lasting behavior change tend to incorporate all these four elements, while those that offer temporary excitement and engagement usually overlook one or more. Research on habit formation shows that it requires repetition, reinforcement, and profound personal investment (Lally et al., 2010 https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674).
Making the Invisible Visible
One of the cleverest mechanisms in environmental gamification is progress tracking which allows people to realize the direct impact of their actions. The WWF Footprint Calculator (https://footprint.wwf.org.uk/), for example, gives users instant updates on how daily activities influence their environmental footprint. Earth Hero (https://earthhero.org/) focuses on another approach, generating monthly reports that summarize eco-friendly actions with actual carbon footprint statistics, and offer comparisons with previous performance.
This is a great tool for environmental activism, because the actual impact is ordinarily invisible and the whole process ends up being discouraging for the user after a while. Nobody can see the water footprint of their lunch, or the outcome of recycling a single trash bag. Making these numbers tangible and showing how they improve over time, creates a clearer feedback loop that strengthens and sustains motivation.
Apps like Giki Zero (https://gikibadges.com/) take this idea even further, by including live environmental data. Users can see real-time information about pollution levels, deforestation rates, and other metrics, which transforms abstract concepts into statistics that feel immediately linked to actions and personally relevant.
Another great example is the game Eco (https://play.eco/) by Strange Loop Games, which does something similar but within its simulation. Players can literally observe the ecosystem respond to their action choices. If they overharvest a forest, wildlife population visibly declines. There is a strong cause-and-effect relationship in the game that, unlike real life, is impossible to ignore. Relevant researchers have also noted that this approach effectively enhances environmental systems thinking (Fjællingsdal & Klöckner, 2019 https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02846).
The Power of Playing Together
Humans are social creatures and for a gamification approach to be highly effective this should be clearly understood. Comparing carbon footprints with others on Oroeco (https://oroeco.com/) creates friendly and productive competition, while team-based cleanup challenges in Clean Games (https://cleangames.ru/en/) take advantage of the natural desire for belonging and recognition, with real-time leaderboards that show a team’s performance compared to the others.
Furthermore, research data on commitment and behavior change has shown that public declarations, like informing others what you intend to do, significantly increase the chances of continuing to completion (Lokhorst et al., 2011 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511411477). Gamified platforms, like All At Once (https://allatonce.org/commitment), that encourage users to publicly share their environmental commitments and progress are essentially exploiting and automating this psychological principle.
There’s also something powerful and profound about witnessing collective impact. When Ant Forest (https://www.antgroup.com/en/news-media/press-releases/1629882059000) shows users that their community has planted over 326 million trees together, the feeling of futility that often sabotages individual will for environmental action is almost entirely eliminated. You see, a single tree might feel insignificant, but being part of a movement planting hundreds or millions? That certainly feels meaningful!
The previously mentioned game Eco (https://play.eco/) requires players to work together to balance sustainability and economic progress. Bad decisions affect everyone and this instantly creates social accountability. Who would want to be the person who over-fished the lake and ruined things for the whole server?
Beyond Rewards: When Consequences Teach Better Than Incentives
It’s already well known that points and badges work effectively for simple behaviors, but when it comes to deeper environmental understanding, a different approach is required. What experience has taught us so far is that the most thoughtful environmental games teach better through consequence rather than reward.
In Terra Nil (https://www.terranil.com/), a game published by Free Lives, players don’t earn points for restoring nature; they witness barren land transform into thriving ecosystems. The reward is intrinsic: the satisfaction of seeing life return. In Alba: A Wildlife Adventure (https://www.albawildlife.com/) developed and published by Ustwo Games, players experience the emotional weight of saving animals and habitats firsthand. These games don’t just tell players that conservation matters; on the contrary, they let them observe and feel it.
Fate of the World (https://store.steampowered.com/app/80200/Fate_of_the_World/) takes this even further, putting players in charge of global climate policy across decades. All the long-term consequences of actions and decisions (economic impacts, political backlash, environmental catastrophe or recovery) unfold over game-time years. Through this mechanism, players develop an intuitive understanding of the complexity and tradeoffs involved in climate policy that no article or documentary could provide in such a profound way.
Another worth-mentioning example is the minimalistic game Paperbark (https://paperbarkgame.com/) which creates strong emotional connections in an impressive way, playing as a wombat and wandering through beautifully illustrated Australian bushland. Through its unique watercolor-inspired art style, the game highlights the beauty and fragility of natural habitats, creating what experts describe as a natural emotional link that encourages players to appreciate and protect wilderness.
This designing approach works, because it respects player intelligence. Rather than lecturing, these games create sandbox environments where understanding emerges naturally from trial and error (experimentation) and experience.
The Fine Line Between Fun and Learning
Well, nobody ever said that creating eco-games that actually work is an easy process. Many designers would agree that the most challenging aspect is this: if you lean too hard on the environmental message, the players might feel they’re being preached at and disengage, while on the other hand, if you make the game too entertaining with sustainability existing only as a token effort, you significantly reduce the chances of changing anybody’s behavior.
The games that succeed in tackling this problem tend to integrate environmental thinking into core mechanisms rather than adding it as an extra layer on top of them. Back to the Eco (https://play.eco/) example again, it is clear from the beginning that sustainability is not just the message, but the whole gameplay. If players ignore ecological balance it will soon lead to a civilization failure. The environmental lesson is inseparable from the playing experience itself.
According to a research on gamified sustainability education, game-based learning seems to enhance knowledge retention and foster critical thinking skills, which leads to increased environmental awareness and engagement (Rudolf, 2024 https://essay.utwente.nl/104445/1/Rudolf_MA_BMS.pdf). In addition, systematic reviews highlight that educational gamification positively influences student motivation and academic performance, reinforcing its potential to drive sustainable behaviors (Manzano-León et al., 2021 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042247).
What Keeps People Coming Back
Initial novelty wears off quickly and this is the trap that many well-intentioned apps fall into. The real challenge of any gamified environmental initiative is whether people stick with it months and years later or not.
A successful long-term engagement recipe seems to require several critical elements: 1) escalating challenges that prevent boredom, 2) social features that create community and accountability, 3) personalization that adapts to individual behavior, and 4) visible long-term impact tracking.
Αs mentioned earlier, Ant Forest excels at this last element. Its users can see exactly how many trees they’ve contributed over the years, where those trees were planted, as well as satellite imagery of the forests they helped create. This long-term documentation is a powerful engine that transforms casual users into committed participants, now with a personal stake in continued engagement. A 2020 report shows that by that year alone, users had planted over 122 million real trees through the platform (Data-Pop Alliance et al., 2020 https://datapopalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ant-Forest-Report-final-version.pdf)!
Adaptive learning is another thing that helps towards long-term engagement. Apps like Earth Hero (https://earthhero.org/) adjust their suggestions based on the users’ progress, ensuring that the challenges remain appropriate and not too easy or impossibly difficult. The goal in these approaches is to maintain what psychologists call “flow”: a state of engaged challenge where motivation comes naturally.
Another research also suggests that games with real-world impact mechanisms have higher retention rates and lead to more meaningful behavior change than games that rely exclusively on virtual rewards (Lu & Ho, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104169).
The Bigger Picture
Considering all these factors, the research data, and the various initiatives happening in this space, something more significant than clever apps and engaging games is being revealed. Gamification represents a fundamental rethinking of how behavior change is approached.
For many decades now, environmentalism has relied on the assumption that knowledge leads to action. That if we could just inform people on how bad things actually were, they would drastically change. But unfortunately, information does not naturally lead to motivation. And games provide that missing piece; that motivation layer that documents and preachings could never effectively trigger.
Well, as a matter of fact, the numbers support this optimism. Studies have shown that gamified initiatives can increase eco-friendly behavior by 40% with proper progress tracking mechanisms (Hamari et al., 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045). Another study of 2021 examining gamification in e-commerce found that reward game elements like points and badges effectively increased consumer engagement in sustainable shopping behaviors, serving as a promising tool to sensitize consumers to sustainable practices (Rauh, Straubert, & Sucky, 2024 https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6e842482-4d76-4b77-84fee53b3feae91a/content). Furthermore, various environmental game players report lasting changes in how they think about consumption, waste, and their relationship to natural systems.
Of course, games alone won’t solve climate change. Policy, technology, and systemic society change remain essential, but individual behavior equally matters, and if game mechanisms can make sustainable choices feel rewarding rather than sacrificial, that’s definitely a tool worth using.
Lastly, it’s worth highlighting that maybe the most profound shift that’s been happening through gamification is in how environmentalism feels. Instead of guilt, fear, and obligation, there’s a feeling of achievement and connection. Instead of invisible sacrifice, there’s visible and tangible progress. Instead of lonely wasted individual action, there’s powerful community impact and shared purpose. That reframing of the whole concept might be the most important thing that games have to offer, contributing to the environmental cause. Not just changing what people do, but essentially changing how they feel about doing what they do.
—
References
Data-Pop Alliance, Green Digital Finance Alliance, & United Nations Environment Programme Inquiry. (2020, July). *Digital technology shaping green and sustainable lifestyles: Exploring Alipay Ant Forest*. https://datapopalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Ant-Forest-Report-final-version.pdf
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. *Psychological Inquiry*, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Eyal, N. (2014). *Hooked: How to build habit-forming products*. Penguin.
Fjællingsdal, K. S., & Klöckner, C. A. (2019). Gaming green: The educational potential of Eco—A digital simulated ecosystem. *Frontiers in Psychology*, 10, 2846. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02846
Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow, and immersion in game-based learning. *Computers in Human Behavior*, 54, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045
Lally, P., van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Potts, H. W. W., & Wardle, J. (2010). How are habits formed: Modelling habit formation in the real world. *European Journal of Social Psychology*, 40(6), 998–1009. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.674
Lokhorst, A. M., Werner, C., Staats, H., van Dijk, E., & Gale, J. L. (2011). Commitment and behavior change: A meta-analysis and critical review of commitment-making strategies in environmental research. *Environment and Behavior*, 45(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511411477
Lu, H.-P., & Ho, H.-C. (2020). Exploring the impact of gamification on users’ engagement for sustainable development: A case study in brand applications. *Sustainability*, 12(10), 4169. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104169
Manzano-León, A., Camacho-Lazarraga, P., Guerrero, M. A., Guerrero-Puerta, L., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., Trigueros, R., & Alias, A. (2021). Between level up and game over: A systematic literature review of gamification in education. *Sustainability*, 13(4), 2247. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042247
Rauh, C., Straubert, C., & Sucky, E. (2024). Promoting sustainable consumer behavior in e-commerce: An empirical study on the influence of gamification on consumers’ return motivation. In *Proceedings of the 57th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS)*. University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/6e842482-4d76-4b77-84fee53b3feae91a/content
Rudolf, J. (2024). *Enhancing sustainability education: The impact of gamification and storytelling on engagement and knowledge acquisition* (Master’s thesis, University of Twente). https://essay.utwente.nl/104445/1/Rudolf_MA_BMS.pdf